LYMEPOLICYWONK: ILADS Weighs in on IOM Process
Today, ILADS sent a letter to the IOM expressing its concerns about the lack of balance in the panel and the speaker list for the Lyme State of the Science conference. Not surprisingly, it was concerned primarily about the exclusion of ILADS physicians from presenting at the conference and with the large roles handed to Dr. Wormer, chair of the IDSA Lyme guidelines panel, and Dr. Aguera-Rosenfeld, who until recently worked at NYMC with him, are both known to have biased views regarding the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease. Exclusionary conduct on the part of the IDSA has prevented the type of scientific debate that is essential to understanding where the science in Lyme disease rests. ILADS took issue with the large roles handed to the IDSA in the diagnosis and treatment issues at the conference, stating: “There is a significant disconnect between IDSA and the community of physicians who treat Lyme disease. There is also an urgent need for transparency in recognizing the limitations of the existing Lyme research. The bulk of the research on Lyme treatment has been controlled by IDSA researchers. Their research is based on sample populations that do not reflect those seen in clinical practice.” Lyme treatment research has been plagued by sample sizes that are too small to measure clinically relevant treatment effects and that do not reflect the types of patients seen in clinical practice. The link to the ILADS letter follows the jump. . .
The letter also quotes Dr. Willy Burgdorfer, formerly of the National Institutes of Health and discoverer of the Lyme spirochete: “The controversy in Lyme disease research is a shameful affair. And I say that because the whole thing is politically tainted. Money goes to people that have for the past 30 years produced the same thing— nothing.”
You can contact Lorraine Johnson, JD, MBA at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- September 16, 2010 at 11:17 am
Thanks for keeping us informed about the latest developments. I continue to hope your efforts will result in increased transparency and inclusion. Thank you for your abiding work.
- September 23, 2010 at 9:49 pm
Help! I do not understand politics well. Can someone please explain to me how from going from having a weak voice at IOM meeting, to having no voice at IOM meeting, is hopefully going to improve this situation. What reaction is hoped for from the congress in response to this form of protest? What are the chances this will occur?
Although I am more comfortable with having a basic handle on some of the medical aspects of the controversy (and am alway ready to learn more!), i don't have enough background to understand this gesture of protest and definitely appreciate anyone willing to take the time to teach me. examples help too
We invite you to comment on our Facebook page.
Visit LymeDisease.org Facebook Page